Tax and claiming
A tax-free country of residence does not protect you from the source country's withholding — and the reverse trap catches people too.
Cross-border lottery wins are more common than they used to be, through travel, courier services and multinational games. Two tax systems may have a claim, and the interaction is not intuitive.
The source country — where the ticket was sold — usually taxes at source if it taxes at all. The operator withholds before paying, so this is not optional and not avoidable.
The residence country — where you live — may tax worldwide income, depending on its rules.
Four combinations follow, and only one of them is genuinely painless.
The commonest trap. A Canadian, Australian or British resident wins a US lottery.
Their home country treats lottery prizes as untaxed windfalls — but that provides no protection at all, because the tax is levied by the United States before the money leaves. Non-resident aliens generally face 30% federal withholding on US gambling winnings, and state withholding may also apply.
Worse, the residence country's exemption means there is usually no domestic tax liability to credit the foreign tax against. Foreign tax credits relieve double taxation by offsetting foreign tax against home tax on the same income; if the home country charges nothing, there is nothing to offset. The 30% is simply gone.
The Canadian position is explicit on this point: prizes are windfalls at home, and US-draw prizes won by Canadians may still face US withholding.
The reverse. Someone resident in a taxing country wins a prize in a jurisdiction that withholds nothing — a UK Lotto or Australian prize, say.
Here the residence country's rules decide everything. Several jurisdictions tax by reference to where the operator is licensed rather than where you live:
So for a Nordic or Hungarian resident, the licensing status of the operator is the determining fact — not the size of the prize, and not where they bought the ticket.
Both jurisdictions charge, and relief depends on the double taxation agreement between them. Typically the residence country gives credit for tax paid at source, up to the amount of its own charge. Whether gambling winnings fall within a given treaty's scope is a technical question and varies by treaty — this is precisely where professional advice earns its fee.
An Australian resident winning a UK prize, for instance. Both treat it as a windfall, and the money arrives whole.
Any communication saying you have won a foreign lottery you did not enter is a scam. The mechanism is always the same: a fee is demanded before the prize can be released, described as tax, legal costs, insurance or a transfer charge.
No legitimate lottery deducts tax by asking the winner to send money. Where tax is due it is withheld from the prize, which is the whole point of withholding. Anyone asking you to pay in order to receive is running an advance-fee fraud — see how lottery scams work, ten red flags, and why no real lottery notifies winners by email.
Two products complicate the analysis further, and they are taxed differently because they are different things:
The distinction matters for tax, for claiming and for what protection you have if something goes wrong — see lottery couriers explained and are lottery betting sites legal and safe?.
General information, not tax advice. Cross-border prize taxation is one of the areas where general guidance is least reliable and local advice most valuable.
Last verified: 2026-08-29